Trump faces revised 2020 election interference charges

 

Trump faces revised 2020 election interference charges



US prosecutors have issued revised charges against former President Donald Trump for his alleged attempts to interfere in the 2020 election after he lost to Joe Biden.

They are in response to a US Supreme Court ruling last month that said presidents enjoy broad immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts while in office.

The revised indictment lays out the same four criminal counts against Trump - which he denies - but they now relate to his status as a political candidate rather than a sitting president.

It appears unlikely that the case - and other criminal cases faced by the Republican - will reach court before this year's election on 5 November.


As well as denying allegations of election interference, Trump has maintained his claim - without evidence - that there was widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.

The revised indictment, brought by Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith, leaves in place the four crimes Trump is accused of committing: conspiracy to defraud the US, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, attempting to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights.

Trump has previously pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The former president's personal lawyer - Todd Blanche - referred the BBC to the Trump campaign, which did not respond to a request for comment.

Trump said in a post on Truth Social that the new indictment was "an effort to resurrect a 'dead' Witch Hunt" and "distract the American People" from the election.

He called for it to be "dismissed IMMEDIATELY".

A source close to Trump's legal team told CBS News, the BBC's US partner, that the new indictment "was not a surprise".

"This is what the government is supposed to do based on what the Supreme Court did," the source said. "It doesn't change our position that we believe Smith's case is flawed and it should be dismissed."

The new charging document - which was slimmed down from 45 to 36 pages - re-works the language of the allegations and refines the ways it argues that the former president allegedly committed these crimes to comport with the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity.

For example, the new indictment drops the claim that Trump tried to pressure justice department officials to work to overturn his defeat. The high court ruled that Trump's direction to justice officials was not illegal.

The special counsel's office explained its reasoning in a statement.

It said the superseding indictment had been presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in the case.

A grand jury is set up by a prosecutor to determine whether there is enough evidence to pursue a prosecution.

The justice department declined to comment further.

The new charging document argues that Trump acted as a private citizen - and not as president - when he undertook the alleged scheme to sway the election.

“The Defendant had no official responsibilities related to the certification proceeding, but he did have a personal interest as a candidate in being named the winner of the election,” reads one new line in the indictment.

Another new line refers to a lawsuit filed by his campaign in Georgia. The old language said the suit was “filed in his name”, but the new indictment says it was “filed in his capacity as a candidate for president”.

The new indictment also appears to have removed the charges against Jeffrey Clark - a former justice department official who played a key role in the so-called fake electors scheme, according to prosecutors.

The fake electors scheme was an attempt to interfere in the Electoral College system that decides presidential elections. It centred on an attempt to persuade Republican-controlled state legislatures in seven states to select Republican electors or not name any electors in states that Mr Biden won.

The falsified certificates were then transferred to the US Senate in an effort to have their votes counted in the place of the real electors, and overturn Mr Biden's win.

Mr Clark was not named in either indictment, but has been identified in the media through public records.

The new indictment leaves in place several key allegations against Trump, including that he attempted to persuade Vice-President Mike Pence to obstruct Mr Biden’s election certification.

In last month’s Supreme Court ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that any conversations between Trump and Mr Pence would probably fall under the category of official acts.

“Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution,” he wrote, adding that it remains to be seen whether the government can rebut “that presumption of immunity”.

The new indictment shows that Mr Smith interpreted the US Supreme Court ruling to mean that his case could still move forward, said Daniel Charles Richman, a constitutional law expert at Columbia Law School.

But whether it would satisfy the Supreme Court's presidential immunity framework remains unclear, the law professor said, as "the Court was painfully vague as to what private conduct done by a president can be charged criminally".

The new indictment would not necessarily expedite the case, either, Mr Richman told the BBC. He doubted that it would be heard before the election.

The CBS News source close to Trump's legal team said that the former president's lawyers would ask for more time to prepare for the case. They said it would likely delay the start of the trial if the judge agrees.

This case came together after Mr Smith was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2022 to oversee two federal investigations into Trump: The election interference case and another case accusing the ex-president of taking classified documents back to his Florida home after leaving office.

On Monday, Mr Smith’s team appealed against a Florida judge's decision to dismiss the confidential documents case.

“The district court deviated from binding Supreme Court precedent, misconstrued the statutes that authorised the special counsel's appointment, and took inadequate account of the longstanding history of Attorney General appointments of special counsels," the special counsel’s team wrote in their appeal.

Both cases face uncertain futures after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision last month.

If Trump defeats Democrat Kamala Harris, he is widely expected to order the justice department to drop all the federal charges that he faces.


Mariah Carey Confirms Her Mom Patricia and Sister Alison Both Died on Same Day: 'My Heart Is Broken' (Exclusive)

 

Mariah Carey Confirms Her Mom Patricia and Sister Alison Both Died on Same Day: 'My Heart Is Broken' (Exclusive)

"I appreciate everyone's love and support and respect for my privacy during this impossible time," says Mariah



















Mariah Carey's mom Patricia and sister Alison died on the same day over the weekend, PEOPLE can confirm.

"My heart is broken that I’ve lost my mother this past weekend. Sadly, in a tragic turn of events, my sister lost her life on the same day," the Grammy-winning singer, 55, said in an exclusive statement to PEOPLE.

"I feel blessed that I was able to spend the last week with my mom before she passed," adds Mariah. "I appreciate everyone’s love and support and respect for my privacy during this impossible time."

No other details, including Patricia and Alison's causes of death, are known at this time.

Patricia, who was previously married to Alfred Roy Carey, was a Juilliard-trained opera singer and vocal coach before the couple welcomed Alison, Mariah and son Morgan. The parents later divorced when the "Hero" singer was 3 years old.

Mariah's relationship with her mother — from whom her vocal talents were inherited — was complicated throughout her life.



Zelensky pledges response after wave of Russian strikes on Ukraine

 

Zelensky pledges response after wave of Russian strikes on Ukraine





Live Reporting

Edited by MR World



Latest Russian strikes more than just revengepublished at 10:28 British Summer Time

Frank Gardner
Security correspondent

It is tempting to see these Russian attacks on cities and infrastructure as simply Vladimir Putin’s revenge for the humiliation of having parts of his country invaded and occupied by his smaller and supposedly weaker neighbour Ukraine.

Kyiv was already braced for a symbolic attack to coincide with Saturday’s independence day.

Remember that Putin does not believe Ukraine has a right to exist as an independent nation, that instead it is an inseparable part of "Greater Russia".

And to some extent, this is just that: a form of blind revenge that reveals the Kremlin’s fury and frustration at being so far incapable of dislodging the Ukrainian force that has inserted itself into Russia’s soft underbelly like a cunning parasite.

But there is also a calculated Russian strategy behind these massed missile and drone attacks across Ukraine.

Knock out the country’s power grid ahead of winter and Ukrainians will become so exhausted and demoralised they will beg their government to sue for a peace deal, which will of course be on Moscow’s terms.

That strategy didn’t work in the winter of 2022 to 2023, nor the next winter. The Ukrainian population has been incredibly resilient.

But like a boxer that keeps landing blows in the same place, Russia is repeating the motion, hoping to wear down its opponent.





At least 22 killed after having IDs checked in Pakistan

At least 22 killed after having IDs checked in Pakistan



Reporting fromIslamabad


                                                                                
A number of vehicles were also set alight in the attacks


Gunmen have killed at least 22 people in south-west Pakistan after forcing them out of their vehicles and checking their identity, officials say.


The attack happened overnight on a highway in Balochistan province, where security forces are battling sectarian, ethnic and separatist violence.


The armed men checked identity documents, reportedly singling out those from Punjab to be shot, before setting the vehicles alight, officials alleged.


The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), a militant group, has said it was behind the attacks in Musa Khel district.







Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi said that security forces had killed 12 militants in operations after the attacks, but did not give further details.

Over the past 24 hours, the BLA has launched a series of attacks on multiple government installations - including police stations and security forces’ camps across province.

In Kalat, 11 were killed - five of them security personnel - and six bodies were recovered in another district in Balochistan.

According to Najibullah Kakar, a senior local official, around 30 to 40 militants were involved in Musa Khel.

"They stopped 22 vehicles," he told AFP news agency. "Vehicles traveling to and from Punjab were inspected, and individuals from Punjab were identified and shot."

The BLA has said it was targeting military personnel travelling in civilian clothes, according to news agency Reuters.

Before the attack, the BLA warned the Baloch public to stay away from the highway, adding that their "fight is against the occupying Pakistani military".

"We have taken full control of all major highways across Balochistan, blocking them completely," it added.

Mohsin Naqvi, the interior minister, said the attacks were "a well-thought out plan to create anarchy in Pakistan".

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed "deep grief and condemnation over the terrorist attack" in a statement issued by his office.

Balochistan is Pakistan's largest province but, although it has more resources than other provinces, it is the least developed.

The BLA and other Baloch separatists have intensified attacks on Punjabis and Sinhdis from elsewhere in Pakistan working in the region. They have also targeted foreign energy firms they accuse of exploiting the region without sharing profits.

In a similar incident in April this year, nine passengers were offloaded from a bus in Balochistan and shot dead after their IDs were checked.

Several Western countries, including the UK and US, have designated the BLA as a global terrorist organisation.








Never will Kamala Harris be his president. At least she won't appear on his TV again 🤷‍♂

 Never will Kamala Harris be his president. At least she won't appear on his TV again 🤷‍♂

Youtuber SteveWillDoit protested against the Democratic candidate this way. 

True, with millions of followers on social media, the TV breakdown probably didn't hit his budget too hard .


Kamala Devi Harris is an American politician and attorney who is the 49th and current vice president of the United States since 2021, serving with President Joe Biden. 



The month since Kamala Harris launched her presidential campaign has been a largely unprecedented spell in American politics: never has a modern general election campaign gone from a standstill to a full sprint so quickly.


In that time Democrats pulled together a well-scripted national convention with slickly produced promotional videos, political set-pieces and musical interludes, all done to boost the new nominee. It was a remarkable test of skill by party operatives under extreme pressure.


Over the course of four days in Chicago – and in the packed campaign rallies Ms Harris has held over the past few weeks – the outlines of her campaign strategy have begun to take shape.


And it’s not exactly what one would expect from a sitting vice-president who has occupied an office in the White House for three-and-a-half-years.


Ms Harris is pushing hard to be viewed as the candidate of change in this race. One who, as she said in her convention speech on Thursday, can "chart a new way forward".


This strategy is in part born out of necessity. Across the globe democracies have been roiled by voter unrest. As economies struggle to recover from the Covid pandemic, regional conflicts churn and tensions over immigration flare up, political incumbents have faced deeply unhappy electorates in Canada, the UK, Germany and India among others.

Polling indicated that President Joe Biden, before he abandoned his re-election campaign last month, was set to confront similar challenges.


The vice-president has turned this situation on its head.

Her background and personal story is a sharp contrast with both the current president and her Republican opponent.


It also helps that Ms Harris is running against a former president who, while also styling himself as a change candidate, has his own sometimes controversial, sometimes unpopular White House record to defend.


“This election, I do strongly believe, is about two very different visions for the future,” Ms Harris said at a rally in North Carolina last week.


“Ours focused on the future, and the other focused on the past.”


Russia accuses British diplomats of spying as Putin threatens West over long-range weapons

  Russia accuses British diplomats of spying as Putin threatens West over long-range weapons   Russia has revoked the accreditation of six B...